By Con George-Kotzabasis
It is
most unwise to have a “big heart” for refugees indiscriminately as one
might finish-up with no heart for refugees at all, as Europe has presently shown
by closing its borders. This is because its foolish politicians never asked the
crucial questions, i.e., what is the cultural and religious background of these
refugees and whether they would be assimilable to Western culture.
Presently,
the heart of Europe is mortally threatened by two great implacable foes: By the
peaceful enemy of demographics and by the bellicose enemy of Islamist terror.
Just two examples: In Holland, 33% of children under the age of fifteen are
Muslim; in the welfare bliss of Norway, there are Muslim enclaves where
indigenous Norwegians are persona non
grata. And one must not delude oneself that Islamist terror is an ephemeral
threat or a rivulet within the Muslim mainstream; on the contrary, it is a
powerful current that determines the course of the mainstream. Thus European
humanitarianism in an adolescent rush of romanticism, embraced its beloved
refugees only to find out that it had embraced its own destroyer.
The
great Islamist scholar Bernard Lewis, predicts, that if this sinister trend of
demographics does not change, Europe will be Muslim in seventy years, if it is
not destroyed first by suicidal fanatics.
Australia
also faces the same predicament, perhaps even in a more exacerbated form. With
250 million Muslims on its north and a sizable and ever increasing Muslim
Diaspora on its land, and the possibility in the near future of a military
conflict with Indonesia, it would become a lethal fifth column. In such a
situation, Australia will hardly be able to prevent its decapitation by the
myrmidons of fanatic Islam.
A
grandmother warned that one had to be very careful where one put his loyalty
and his genetic organ. It is advisable that humanitarian policy-makers on open-door non-discriminatory migration
take notice of this grandmotherly precept.
