Obama's Oxymoronic Suggestion to Parley with Sponsors of Terror
Hypocrisy On Hamas
By James P. Rubin, former assistant secretary of state during the Clinton administration
Washington Post, May 16, 2008
A brief reply by Con George-Kotzabasis
Two years is a long time in the life of terrorism! Rubin by giving us the answer of McCain to his question of two years ago that the latter was prepared to talk to Hamas and accuse him therefore with hypocrisy can only do so by disregarding this elementary fact. In these two years Hamas has not even shown a propensity to give the Palestinian people “security and a decent life and decent future” nor “democracy”, to quote Rubin (which incidentally was the rider of McCain’s answer.), and continues to engage unappeasably in violence and terror while it’s in government. In such conditions it would be oxymoronic now for any politician, such as Obama suggested and McCain denounced, to open the door of negotiations with a terrorist government while the door of the war on terror has not closed.
Strategically, politically, and morally, it would not only be dull-witted but also close to treachery for any government that has committed its armed forces to fight global terror at the same time to even hint that it is willing to start negotiations with rogue governments that back and continue to be inflexible in their support and sponsorship of terror.
I rest on my oars: Your turn now
1 comment:
Hey. I saw your comment at Zbigniew Brzezinski Calls Iraq War a Historic, Strategic and Moral Calamity. Thank you for pointing out that Brzezinski is in fact responsible for Afghanistan being a quagmire and host for al Qaeda.
ZB starts a slaughter in Afghanistan and is delighted with himself. Bush tries to reform one part of the Middle East and ZB is livid. Oh, if only he made sense!
Post a Comment